Preprint / Version 1

Warming up to improved performance? Effects of different specific warm-up protocols on neuromuscular performance in trained individuals

##article.authors##

  • Alysson Enes
  • Adam Mohan
  • Alec Pinero
  • Tom Hermann
  • Max Sapuppo
  • Max Coleman
  • Patroklos Androulakis Korakakis
  • Milo Wolf
  • Tacito Souza-Junior
  • Paul Swinton
  • Brad Schoenfeld Lehman College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51224/SRXIV.559

Keywords:

resistance training, strength training, rating of perceived exertion, volume load, fatigue index

Abstract

Warm-up strategies are often performed to enhance resistance training (RT) performance from a psychophysiological standpoint. However, it remains unclear whether the number of sets or the loading scheme used during a specific warm-up (SWU) influences neuromuscular performance in multiple-set RT performed to concentric failure. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of varying the set number and loads in SWU protocols on RT session performance. Using a crossover design, twenty-nine participants (RT experience of 4.5 ± 3.9 years) were randomized to the following experimental conditions: 1 set of 3-4 repetitions at 75%10RM (1SET), 2 sets of 3-4 repetitions at 55% and 75%10RM (2SET) and no warm-up (CON). The SWU protocols were performed before the working sets (4 sets at 10RM load to concentric failure) on each exercise (Smith-machine bench press and 45o leg press). For neuromuscular and perceptual responses, we assessed repetition performance, fatigue index, and volume load, as well as exercise readiness and rating of perceived exertion, respectively. Analyses were completed using linear mixed models within a Bayesian framework. Condition comparisons were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs), with posterior distributions and evidence ratios used to assess support for the superiority of SWU and the ordered hypothesis that CON < 1SET < 2SET, respectively. SMDs comparing 1SET and 2SET to CON indicated negligible to small potential differences for all outcomes. Posterior probabilities of SWU conditions being superior to CON remained relatively low for the bench press and 45° leg press, with evidence ratios generally providing strong evidence against the ordered hypothesis. Our findings indicate that SWU protocols are similar to CON regarding RT performance and perceptual responses. The results suggest it is possible to achieve greater time efficiency in RT sessions by forgoing a SWU when training at ~10RM loads.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Schoenfeld B, Fisher J, Grgic J, et al. Resistance Training Recommendations to Maximize Muscle Hypertrophy in an Athletic Population: Position Stand of the IUSCA. Int J Strength Cond. 2021;1(1).

Boullosa D. Post-activation performance enhancement strategies in sport: a brief review for practitioners. Hum Mov. 2021;22(3):101-109.

Ratamess N. ACSM’s Foundations of Strength Training and Conditioning. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2021.

Schoenfeld BJ, Snarr RL. NSCA’s Essentials of Personal Training. Human Kinetics; 2021.

Haff GG, Triplett NT. Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning 4th Edition. Human kinetics; 2015.

Barroso R, Silva-Batista C, Tricoli V, Roschel H, Ugrinowitsch C. The effects of different intensities and durations of the general warm-up on leg press 1RM. J Strength & Cond Res. 2013;27(4):1009-1013.

Abad CCC, Prado ML, Ugrinowitsch C, Tricoli V, Barroso R. Combination of general and specific warm-ups improves leg-press one repetition maximum compared with specific warm-up in trained individuals. J Strength & Cond Res. 2011;25(8):2242-2245.

McGowan CJ, Pyne DB, Thompson KG, Rattray B. Warm-up strategies for sport and exercise: mechanisms and applications. Sport Med. 2015;45:1523-1546.

Afonso J, Brito J, Abade E, et al. Revisiting the “Whys” and “Hows” of the Warm-Up: Are We Asking the Right Questions? Sport Med. 2024;54(1):23-30.

Ribeiro B, Pereira A, Neves P, Marinho D, Marques M, Neiva HP. The effect of warm-up in resistance training and strength performance: a systematic review. Motricidade. 2021;17(1):87-94.

Ribeiro AS, Romanzini M, Schoenfeld BJ, Souza MF, Avelar A, Cyrino ES. Effect of different warm-up procedures on the performance of resistance training exercises. Percept Mot Skills. 2014;119(1):133-145.

Brandenburg JP. The acute effects of prior dynamic resistance exercise using different loads on subsequent upper-body explosive performance in resistance-trained men. J Strength & Cond Res. 2005;19(2):427-432.

Abbud N, Tabet J, Dias M. Efeito do aquecimento específico em um teste de repetições máximas no exercício de supino reto. Rev eletronica da Fac Metod Granbery. 2013;14:1-16.

Blazevich AJ, Babault N. Post-activation potentiation versus post-activation performance enhancement in humans: historical perspective, underlying mechanisms, and current issues. Front Physiol. 2019;10:1359.

Nader AN, da Silva AMG, da Rocha HNB, et al. Influência dos aquecimentos geral e específico na força de membros superiores. RBPFEX-Revista Bras Prescrição e Fisiol do Exerc. 2009;3(18).

Ribeiro B, Pereira A, Neves PP, et al. The role of specific warm-up during bench press and squat exercises: A novel approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6882.

De Freitas MC, Rossi FE, Colognesi LA, et al. Postactivation potentiation improves acute resistance exercise performance and muscular force in trained men. J Strength Cond Res. 2021;35(5):1357-1363.

Viveiros L, Gioia K, Nasser I, et al. High-load and low-volume warm-up increases performance in a resistance training session. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024;40:1487-1491.

Wang F, Gelfand AE. A simulation-based approach to Bayesian sample size determination for performance under a given model and for separating models. Stat Sci. Published online 2002:193-208.

Sforzo GA, Touey PR. Manipulating exercise order affects muscular performance during a resistance exercise training session. J Strength Cond Res. 1996;10(1):20-24.

Zourdos MC, Klemp A, Dolan C, et al. Novel resistance training--specific rating of perceived exertion scale measuring repetitions in reserve. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(1):267-275.

Strohacker K, Zakrajsek RA. Determining dimensionality of exercise readiness using exploratory factor analysis. J Sports Sci Med. 2016;15(2):229.

Åkerstedt T, Gillberg M. Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. Int J Neurosci. 1990;52(1-2):29-37.

Lee MD, Wagenmakers EJ. Bayesian Cognitive Modeling: A Practical Course. Cambridge university press; 2014.

Swinton PA, Murphy A. Comparative effect size distributions in strength and conditioning and implications for future research: a meta-analysis. Published online 2022.

Garbisu-Hualde A, Gutierrez L, Santos-Concejero J. Post-activation performance enhancement as a strategy to improve bench press performance to volitional failure. J Hum Kinet. 2023;88:199.

Lisboa F, Kassiano W, Stavinski N, et al. Effects of static stretching and specific warm-up on the repetition performance in upper-and lower-limb exercises in resistance-trained older women. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025;37(1):1-6.

Souza D, Silva AG, Vale A, et al. Effect of warm-up protocols using lower and higher loads on multiple-set back squat volume-load. PeerJ. 2024;12:e17347.

Seitz LB, Haff GG. Factors modulating post-activation potentiation of jump, sprint, throw, and upper-body ballistic performances: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Sport Med. 2016;46:231-240.

Seitz LB, Trajano GS, Haff GG, Dumke CCLS, Tufano JJ, Blazevich AJ. Relationships between maximal strength, muscle size, and myosin heavy chain isoform composition and postactivation potentiation. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(5):491-497.

Washif JA, Beaven CM, Pagaduan J, et al. Current practices of warm-up during strength training and conditioning based on coaching experience. Sport Sci Health. Published online 2025:1-13.

Downloads

Posted

2025-05-30