Preprint / Version 1

Sex differences in rating of perceived exertion in different body-weight resistance exercises

##article.authors##

  • Vinícius Schneider Universidade Federal do Rio Grande Do Sul https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4332-1042
  • Renato Maynart
  • Leandro de Oliveira Carpes
  • Jocelito Bijoldo Martins
  • Rodrigo Ferrari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51224/SRXIV.476

Keywords:

Exercise, bodyweight strength training, Exercise Intensity, exercise training

Abstract

Aims: This study analyzed and compared the the rating perceived exertion (RPE) of upper and lower body weight resistance exercises (BWR) performed by men and women. Methods: Forty-eight participants (24 men and 24 women) attended two experimental sessions: an introduction to the BWR and RPE scale and an assessment session to determine the RPE of each exercise. Four dynamic BWR (Lower-limb: Squat and Lunge; Upper-limb: Knee Push-Up and Push-Up) and two isometric BWR (Core: Front and Side Plank) were evaluated. Each exercise's RPE was evaluated using a Borg CR10 scale. Results: Push-up exercises have the highest RPE value (4 men, 10 women) and squat exercise the lowest RPE value (1 men, 2 women). Comparing the RPE’s between men and women, there was a significant difference in the upper-limb exercises (Men: 4; Women: 10; P <0.001). There was no difference in lower-limb (Men: 3; Women: 3; P= 0.991) and core exercises (Men: 3; Women: 3; P= 0.856). Women demonstrated a higher RPE’s than men for the upper-limb exercises, but did not show for higher RPE’s in lower-limb and core BWR. Conclusion: The study provides new evidence for the use of RPE in BWR interventions and suggests that exercise professionals should consider that RPE during BWR is influenced by exercise, sex, and training status.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abdelbasset WK (2020) Stay Home: Role of Physical Exercise Training in Elderly Individuals' Ability to Face the COVID-19 Infection. J Immunol Res 2020: 8375096.

Bishop P, Cureton K and Collins M (1987) Sex difference in muscular strength in equally-trained men and women. Ergonomics 30(4): 675-687.

Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Mayer-Berger W, Meister ER, et al. (2004) Recommendations for resistance exercise in cardiac rehabilitation. Recommendations of the German Federation for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 11(4): 352-361.

Buckley JP and Borg GA (2011) Borg's scales in strength training; from theory to practice in young and older adults. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 36(5): 682-692.

Cavarretta DJ, Hall EE and Bixby WR (2022) The Effects of Increasing Training Load on Affect and Perceived Exertion. J Strength Cond Res 36(1): 16-21.

Chen MJ, Fan X and Moe ST (2002) Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. J Sports Sci 20(11): 873-899.

Eston R and Evans HJ (2009) The validity of submaximal ratings of perceived exertion to predict one repetition maximum. J Sports Sci Med 8(4): 567-573.

Flanagan SD, Mills MD, Sterczala AJ, et al. (2014) The relationship between muscle action and repetition maximum on the squat and bench press in men and women. J Strength Cond Res 28(9): 2437-2442.

Foster C, Florhaug JA, Franklin J, et al. (2001) A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res 15(1): 109-115.

Garcia-Hermoso A, López-Gil JF, Ramírez-Vélez R, et al. (2023) Adherence to aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 3.3 million participants across 32 countries. British Journal of Sports Medicine 57(4): 225-229.

Gentil P, Campos MH, Soares S, et al. (2017) Comparison of elbow flexor isokinetic peak torque and fatigue index between men and women of different training level. Eur J Transl Myol 27(4): 7070.

Harrison JS (2010) Bodyweight Training: A Return To Basics. Strength & Conditioning Journal 32(2): 52-55.

Kaur H, Singh T, Arya YK, et al. (2020) Physical Fitness and Exercise During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Enquiry. Front Psychol 11: 590172.

Laurent CM, Green JM, Bishop PA, et al. (2010) Effect of gender on fatigue and recovery following maximal intensity repeated sprint performance. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 50(3): 243-253.

Lea JWD, O'Driscoll JM, Hulbert S, et al. (2022) Convergent Validity of Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Resistance Exercise in Healthy Participants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med Open 8(1): 2.

Martins FM, de Paula Souza A, Nunes PRP, et al. (2018) High-intensity body weight training is comparable to combined training in changes in muscle mass, physical performance, inflammatory markers and metabolic health in postmenopausal women at high risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Exp Gerontol 107: 108-115.

Park AH, Zhong S, Yang H, et al. (2022) Impact of COVID-19 on physical activity: A rapid review. Journal of Global Health 12.

Pincivero DM, Coelho AJ, Campy RM, et al. (2002) The effects of voluntary contraction effort on quadriceps femoris electromyogram median frequency in humans: a muscle and sex comparison. Eur J Appl Physiol 87(4-5): 448-455.

Pincivero DM, Coelho AJ and Erikson WH (2000) Perceived exertion during isometric quadriceps contraction. A comparison between men and women. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 40(4): 319-326.

Pincivero DM, Polen RR and Byrd BN (2010) Gender and contraction mode on perceived exertion. Int J Sports Med 31(5): 359-363.

Sayers SP and Clarkson PM (2001) Force recovery after eccentric exercise in males and females. European Journal of Applied Physiology 84(1-2): 122-126.

Schwartz J, Oh P, Takito MY, et al. (2021) Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Reproducibility of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+): The Brazilian Portuguese Version. Front Cardiovasc Med 8: 712696.

Suchomel TJ, Nimphius S, Bellon CR, et al. (2021) Training for Muscular Strength: Methods for Monitoring and Adjusting Training Intensity. Sports Medicine 51(10): 2051-2066.

Vandenbroucke JP, Von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. (2007) Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration. PLoS Medicine 4(10): e297.

Downloads

Posted

2024-11-04