Is the motivational pillar of OPTIMAL theory indeed motivating?
A quantitative appraisal of the existing evidence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51224/SRXIV.390Keywords:
skill acquisition, self-controlled learning, enhanced expectancies, intrinsic motivation, self-efficacyAbstract
Motivation is commonly recognized by researchers and practitioners as a key factor for motor learning. The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning (Wulf & Lewthwaite, 2016) claims that practice conditions that enhance learners’ expectancies for future successful outcomes or that are autonomy supportive are motivating, thus leading to better learning. To examine the current evidence of the association between motivation and motor learning, we searched the literature for studies that manipulated expectancies and/or autonomy support. Specifically, our goals were to assess whether these manipulations resulted in group differences in motivation and, if so, whether increased motivation was associated with learning advantages. Results showed that out of 166 experiments, only 21% (n = 35) included at least one measure of motivation, even though this is the main factor proposed by OPTIMAL theory to explain the learning benefits of these manipulations. Among those, only 23% (n = 8) found group-level effects on motivation, suggesting that these manipulations might not be as motivating as expected. Of the eight experiments that found a group-level effect on motivation, five also observed learning benefits, offering limited evidence that when practice conditions increase motivation, learning is more likely to occur. Overall, the small number of studies assessing motivation precludes any reliable conclusions on the association between motivation and motor learning from being drawn. Together, our results question whether manipulations implemented in the research lines supporting OPTIMAL theory are indeed motivating and highlight the lack of sufficient evidence in these literatures to support that increased motivation benefits motor learning.
Metrics
References
Abbas, Z. A., & North, J. S. (2018). Good-vs. poor-trial feedback in motor learning: The role of self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation across levels of task difficulty. Learning and Instruction, 55, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.009
Aiken, C. A., Post, P. G., Hout, M. C., & Fairbrother, J. T. (2020). Self-controlled amount and pacing of practice facilitate learning of a sequential timing task. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(4), 405-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1704498
Ali, A., Fawver, B., Kim, J., Fairbrother, J., & Janelle, C. M. (2012). Too much of a good thing: random practice scheduling and self-control of feedback lead to unique but not additive learning benefits. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 503. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00503
Bacelar, M. F., Lohse, K. R., & Miller, M. W. (2020). The effect of rewards and punishments on learning action selection and execution components of a motor skill. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 8(3), 475-496. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2019-0039
Bacelar, M. F., Parma, J. O., Cabral, D., Daou, M., Lohse, K. R., & Miller, M. W. (2022). Dissociating the contributions of motivational and information processing factors to the self-controlled feedback learning benefit. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 59, 102119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102119
Bacelar, M. F., Parma, J. O., Murrah, W. M., & Miller, M. W. (2022). Meta-analyzing enhanced expectancies on motor learning: Positive effects but methodological concerns. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2022.2042839
Barros, J. A. C., Yantha, Z. D., Carter, M. J., Hussien, J., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2019). Examining the impact of error estimation on the effects of self-controlled feedback. Human Movement Science, 63, 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2018.12.002
Batista, M. T. S., Figueiredo, L. S., Martins, C. A., Nogueira, N. G. D. H. M., Ferreira, B. D. P., & Benda, R. N. (2023). Expectation of teaching and self-controlled KR in motor skills acquisition: Are there additive effects?. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 94(2), 391-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2021.1999891
Carter, M. J., Lohse, K. R., & Miller, M. W. (2022). Making Strong Predictions: Testing Causal Hypotheses in Motor Behavior Studies. In Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, Vol. 44, pp. S33-S33.
Carter, M. J., Smith, V., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2016). Judgments of learning are significantly higher following feedback on relatively good versus relatively poor trials despite no actual learning differences. Human movement science, 45, 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.11.006
Cataldi, S., Stanley, A. T., Miniaci, M. C., & Sulzer, D. (2022). Interpreting the role of the striatum during multiple phases of motor learning. The FEBS journal, 289(8), 2263-2281. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15908
Chester, D. S., & Lasko, E. N. (2021). Construct validation of experimental manipulations in social psychology: Current practices and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(2), 377-395. https://doi.org/10.1177/174569162095068
Chiviacowsky, S., Harter, N. M., Gonçalves, G. S., & Cardozo, P. L. (2019). Temporal comparative feedback facilitates golf putting. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2691. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02691
Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Self-controlled learning: The importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00458
Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., & Campos, T. (2012). Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson’s disease. Gait & Posture, 35(4), 601–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.003
Chung, Y., Lewthwaite, R., Winstein, C. J., Monterosso, J. R., & Fisher, B. E. (2020). Expectancy and affective response to challenging balance practice conditions in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14723
Choi, Y., Shin, E. Y., & Kim, S. (2020). Spatiotemporal dissociation of fMRI activity in the caudate nucleus underlies human de novo motor skill learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(38), 23886–23897. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2003963117
Daniel, R., & Pollmann, S. (2014). A universal role of the ventral striatum in reward-based learning: evidence from human studies. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 114, 90-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2014.05.002
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Drews, R., Tani, G., Cardozo, P., & Chiviacowsky, S. (2020). Positive feedback praising good performance does not alter the learning of an intrinsically motivating task in 10-year-old children. European Journal of Human Movement, 45. https://doi.org/10.21134/eurjhm.2020.45.5
Ferreira, B. P., Malloy-Diniz, L. F., Parma, J. O., Nogueira, N. G., Apolinário-Souza, T., Ugrinowitsch, H., & Lage, G. M. (2019). Self-controlled feedback and learner impulsivity in sequential motor learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 126(1), 157-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512518807341
Goudini, R., Ashrafpoornavaee, S., & Farsi, A. (2019). The effects of self-controlled and instructor-controlled feedback on motor learning and intrinsic motivation among novice adolescent taekwondo players. Acta Gymnica, 49(1), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.5507/ag.2019.002
Grand, K. F., Bruzi, A. T., Dyke, F. B., Godwin, M. M., Leiker, A. M., Thompson, A. G., Buchanan, T. L., & Miller, M. W. (2015). Why self-controlled feedback enhances motor learning: Answers from electroencephalography and indices of motivation. Human Movement Science, 43, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.06.013
Grand, K. F., Daou, M., Lohse, K. R., & Miller, M. W. (2017). Investigating the mechanisms underlying the effects of an incidental choice on motor learning. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(2), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0041
Grealy, M. A., Cummings, J., & Quinn, K. (2019). The effect of false positive feedback on learning an inhibitory-action task in older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 45(4), 346-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2019.1627494
Ikudome, S., Kou, K., Ogasa, K., Mori, S., & Nakamoto, H. (2019). The effect of choice on motor learning for learners with different levels of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 41(3), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2018-0011
Jaquess, K. J., Lu, Y., Ginsberg, A., Kahl Jr, S., Lu, C., Ritland, B., ... & Hatfield, B. D. (2021). Effect of self-controlled practice on neuro-cortical dynamics during the processing of visual performance feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 53(5), 632-643. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2020.1817841
Katz, A., & Westera, W. (2019). The effect of learner autonomy on motor learning: empirical study in dutch vocational education. Int. J. Self Direct. Learn, 16, 22-38.
Keller, J., & Burkman, E. (1993). Motivation principles. Instructional message design: Principles from the behavioral and cognitive sciences, 2, 3-49.
Kok, M., Komen, A., van Capelleveen, L., & van der Kamp, J. (2020). The effects of self-controlled video feedback on motor learning and self-efficacy in a Physical Education setting: an exploratory study on the shot-put. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 25(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2019.1688773
Leiker, A. M., Bruzi, A. T., Miller, M. W., Nelson, M., Wegman, R., & Lohse, K. R. (2016). The effects of autonomous difficulty selection on engagement, motivation, and learning in a motion-controlled video game task. Human Movement Science, 49, 326-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2016.08.005
Leiker, A. M., Pathania, A., Miller, M. W., & Lohse, K. R. (2019). Exploring the neurophysiological effects of self-controlled practice in motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 7(1), 13-34. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2017-0051
Lessa, H. T., & Chiviacowsky, S. (2015). Self-controlled practice benefits motor learning in older adults. Human movement science, 40, 372-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.01.013
Lessa, H. T., Tani, G., & Chiviacowsky, S. (2018). Benefits of enhanced expectancies through temporal-comparative feedback for motor learning in older adults. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 49(6), 521-530. https://doi.org/10.7352/IJSP.2018.49.521
Lewis, A. F., Bohnenkamp, R., Johnson, L., den Ouden, D. B., Wilcox, S., Fritz, S. L., & Stewart, J. C. (2023). Effects of positive social comparative feedback on motor sequence learning and performance expectancies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1005705. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1005705
Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2010). Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 738–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903111839
Lohse, K., Miller, M., Bacelar, M., & Krigolson, O. (2019). Errors, rewards, and reinforcement in motor skill learning. In N. J. Hodges & A. M. Williams (Eds.), Skill Acquisition in Sport (3rd ed., pp. 39–60). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351189750-3
McKay, B., Bacelar, M. F., Parma, J. O., Miller, M. W., & Carter, M. J. (2023). The combination of reporting bias and underpowered study designs has substantially exaggerated the motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice and enhanced expectancies: A meta-analysis. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2023.2207255
McKay, B., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2022). Autonomy support via instructionally irrelevant choice not beneficial for motor performance or learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 93(1), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2020.1795056
McKay, B., Yantha, Z., Hussien, J., Carter, M., & Ste-Marie, D. (2022). Meta-analytic findings of the self-controlled motor learning literature: Underpowered, biased, and lacking evidential value. Meta-Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2021.2803
Mousavi, S. M., Gray, L., Beik, S., & Deshayes, M. (2021). “You kick like a girl!” The effects of gender stereotypes on motor skill learning in young adolescents. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 43(6), 450-458. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2020-0255
Ong, N. T., Hawke, J., & Hodges, N. J. (2019). Target size manipulations affect error-processing duration and success perceptions but not behavioural indices of learning. Brain Sciences, 9(5), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9050119
Ong, N. T., & Hodges, N. J. (2018). Balancing our perceptions of the efficacy of success-based feedback manipulations on motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 50(6), 614–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2017.1383227
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International journal of surgery, 88, 105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
Parma, J. O., Bacelar, M. F., Cabral, D. A., Lohse, K. R., Hodges, N. J., & Miller, M. W. (2023). That looks easy! Evidence against the benefits of an easier criterion of success for enhancing motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 66, 102394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102394
Patterson, J. T., & Azizieh, J. (2012). Knowing the good from the bad: Does being aware of KR content matter?. Human movement science, 31(6), 1449-1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2012.04.004
Pedersen. (2024). Patchwork: The composer of plots. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=patchwork
Post, P. G., Aiken, C. A., Laughlin, D. D., & Fairbrother, J. T. (2016). Self-control over combined video feedback and modeling facilitates motor learning. Human Movement Science, 47, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2016.01.014
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Ranganathan, R., Doherty, C., Gussert, M., Kaplinski, E., Koje, M., & Krishnan, C. (2022). Scientific basis and active ingredients of current therapeutic interventions for stroke rehabilitation. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 40(2), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-211243
Rudis, B., & Gandy, D. (2019). Waffle: Create waffle chart visualizations. R package version, 1(1). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/waffle/waffle.pdf
Saemi, E., Wulf, G., Varzaneh, A. G., & Zarghami, M. (2011). "Feedback" após boas versus más tentativas melhora a aprendizagem motora em crianças. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte, 25(4), 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807- 55092011000400011
St. Germain, L., McKay, B., Poskus, A., Williams, A., Leshchyshen, O., Feldman, S., ... & Carter, M. J. (2023). Exercising choice over feedback schedules during practice is not advantageous for motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(2), 621-633. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02170-5
St. Germain, L., Williams, A., Balbaa, N., Poskus, A., Leshchyshen, O., Lohse, K. R., & Carter, M. J. (2022). Increased perceptions of autonomy through choice fail to enhance motor skill retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48(4), 370. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000992
Ste-Marie, D. M., Vertes, K. A., Law, B., & Rymal, A. M. (2013). Learner-Controlled Self-Observation is advantageous for motor skill acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology., 3, 556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00556
Steel, A., Silson, E. H., Stagg, C. J., & Baker, C. I. (2016). The impact of reward and punishment on skill learning depends on task demands. Scientific Reports, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36056
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D. A., François, R., ... & Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of open source software, 4(43), 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
Widmer, M., Ziegler, N., Held, J., Luft, A., & Lutz, K. (2016). Chapter 13—Rewarding feedback promotes motor skill consolidation via striatal activity. In B. Studer & S. Knecht (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research (Vol. 229, pp. 303–323). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.05.006
Wu, W. F., & Magill, R. A. (2011). Allowing learners to choose: Self-controlled practice schedules for learning multiple movement patterns. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 82(3), 449-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599777
Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Altering mindset can enhance motor learning in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025718
Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1382–1414. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9
Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., & Hooyman, A. (2013). Can ability conceptualizations alter the impact of social comparison in motor learning? Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 1(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.1.1.20
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Juliana Parma, Matthew W. Miller, Mariane F. B. Bacelar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
