Cognitive-physical task interaction during self-paced cycling
A multiscale Granger Causality study
Keywords:dual-task, cognition, cognitive load, top-down processing, exercise, stimulus-response conflict, cognitive-physical interaction
Studying cognitive-physical interactions in self-paced high-intensity physical exercise presents the challenge of accounting for potential dual-task effects. In fact, self-pacing is thought to rely on top-down cognitive processing which makes it more susceptible to cognitive-physical interactions. Hence, even in paradigms where the experimental manipulation concerns the intensity of the exercise (i.e. high intensity versus low intensity) rather than its presence (i.e. exercise versus resting), performing the physical task might be more cognitively demanding in the higher intensity exercise condition. Here, we investigate the temporal dynamics of cognitive-physical interactions during dual-tasking by applying time-domain Granger Causality to data that combined indoor self-paced cycling and a cognitive task. Moreover, we investigate whether greater experience in self-pacing during cycling would reduce the need for exerting top-down control and therefore dual-task effects. We show that while cognitive and physical performance can interact in some individuals, better physical performance was not detrimental to cognitive performance in the expert cyclists group. We therefore propose that in self-paced physical exercise cognitive-physical interactions in expert cyclists are overall not confounded by dual-tasks interaction effects, although such interaction cannot be excluded for every single participant.
Al-Yahya, E., Dawes, H., Smith, L., Dennis, A., Howells, K., & Cockburn, J. (2011). Cognitive motor interference while walking: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.008
Audiffren, M., Tomporowski, P. D., & Zagrodnik, J. (2008). Acute aerobic exercise and information processing: Energizing motor processes during a choice reaction time task. Acta Psychologica, 129(3), 410–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.006
Barrett, A., & Barnett, L. (2013). Granger causality is designed to measure effect, not mechanism. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fninf.2013.00006
Brick, N. E., MacIntyre, T. E., & Campbell, M. J. (2016). Thinking and Action: A Cognitive Perspective on Self-Regulation during Endurance Performance. Frontiers in Physiology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00159
Brisswalter, J., Durand, M., Delignieres, D., & Legros, P. (1995). Optimal and non-optimal demand in a dual-task of pedaling and simple reaction time: Effects on energy expenditure and cognitive performance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 29, 15–34.
Chang, Y.-K., Chi, L., Etnier, J. L., Wang, C.-C., Chu, C.-H., & Zhou, C. (2014). Effect of acute aerobic exercise on cognitive performance: Role of cardiovascular fitness. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(5), 464–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.04.007
Ciria, L. F., Luque-Casado, A., Sanabria, D., Holgado, D., Ivanov, P. Ch., & Perakakis, P. (2019). Oscillatory brain activity during acute exercise: Tonic and transient neural response to an oddball task. Psychophysiology, 56(5), e13326. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13326
Ciria, L. F., Perakakis, P., Luque-Casado, A., & Sanabria, D. (2018). Physical exercise increases overall brain oscillatory activity but does not influence inhibitory control in young adults. NeuroImage, 181, 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.009
Duckworth, S. C., Higginbotham, C. S., Pederson, J. A., Rogers, R. R., Marshall, M. R., Williams, T. D., & Ballmann, C. G. (2021). Physical and Cognitive Performance During Upper-Extremity Versus Full-Body Exercise Under Dual Tasking Conditions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128(1), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512520945088
Edwards, A. M., & Polman, R. C. J. (2013). Pacing and awareness: Brain regulation of physical activity. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 43(11), 1057–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0091-4
Faes, L., Nollo, G., Stramaglia, S., & Marinazzo, D. (2017). Multiscale Granger causality. Physical Review E, 96(4), 042150. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.042150
Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791
Holgado, D., & Sanabria, D. (2021). Does self-paced exercise depend on executive processing? A narrative review of the current evidence. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14(1), 130–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2020.1774915
Kim, S.-J., Koh, K., Boyd, S., & Gorinevsky, D. (2009). L1 Trend Filtering. SIAM Review, 51(2), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1137/070690274
McCarthy, J. P., & Wyatt, F. B. (2003). Prediction equation: Power output from heart rate for cyclists. International Sports Journal, 7(1), 56–61.
Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
Pinto, H., Pernice, R., Silva, M. E., Javorka, M., Faes, L., & Rocha, A. P. (2022). Multiscale partial information decomposition of dynamic processes with short and long-range correlations: Theory and application to cardiovascular control. Physiological Measurement, 43(8), 085004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ac826c
Robertson, I. H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B. T., & Yiend, J. (1997). `Oops!’: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35(6), 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00015-8
Schreiber, T., & Schmitz, A. (1996). Improved Surrogate Data for Nonlinearity Tests. Physical Review Letters, 77(4), 635–638. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.635
Shojaie, A., & Fox, E. B. (2022). Granger causality: A review and recent advances. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 9, 289-319.
Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(3), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020586
Zandonai, T., Holgado, D., Ciria, L. F., Zabala, M., Hopker, J., Bekinschtein, T., & Sanabria, D. (2021). Novel evidence on the effect of tramadol on self-paced high-intensity cycling. Journal of Sports Sciences, 39(13), 1452–1460. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2021.1877440
Copyright (c) 2023 Chiara Avancini, Daniele Marinazzo, Daniel Sanabria, Juan José Pérez-Díaz, José Antonio Salas-Montoro, Luis Fernando Ciria (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.