Preprint / Version 1

Cognitive-physical task interaction during self-paced cycling

A multiscale Granger Causality study

##article.authors##

  • Chiara Avancini University of Granada
  • Daniele Marinazzo Ghent University, Department of Data Analysis, Faculty of Psychological and Educational Sciences
  • Daniel Sanabria University of Granada, Mind Brain and Behavior Research Center
  • Juan José Pérez-Díaz University of Granada, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte
  • José Antonio Salas-Montoro University of Granada, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte
  • Luis Fernando Ciria University of Granada, Mind Brain and Behavior Research Center

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51224/SRXIV.341

Keywords:

dual-task, cognition, cognitive load, top-down processing, exercise, stimulus-response conflict, cognitive-physical interaction

Abstract

Studying cognitive-physical interactions in self-paced high-intensity physical exercise presents the challenge of accounting for potential dual-task effects. In fact, self-pacing is thought to rely on top-down cognitive processing which makes it more susceptible to cognitive-physical interactions. Hence, even in paradigms where the experimental manipulation concerns the intensity of the exercise (i.e. high intensity versus low intensity) rather than its presence (i.e. exercise versus resting), performing the physical task might be more cognitively demanding in the higher intensity exercise condition. Here, we investigate the temporal dynamics of cognitive-physical interactions during dual-tasking by applying time-domain Granger Causality to data that combined indoor self-paced cycling and a cognitive task. Moreover, we investigate whether greater experience in self-pacing during cycling would reduce the need for exerting top-down control and therefore dual-task effects. We show that while cognitive and physical performance can interact in some individuals, better physical performance was not detrimental to cognitive performance in the expert cyclists group. We therefore propose that in self-paced physical exercise cognitive-physical interactions in expert cyclists are overall not confounded by dual-tasks interaction effects, although such interaction cannot be excluded for every single participant.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Al-Yahya, E., Dawes, H., Smith, L., Dennis, A., Howells, K., & Cockburn, J. (2011). Cognitive motor interference while walking: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.008

Audiffren, M., Tomporowski, P. D., & Zagrodnik, J. (2008). Acute aerobic exercise and information processing: Energizing motor processes during a choice reaction time task. Acta Psychologica, 129(3), 410–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.006

Barrett, A., & Barnett, L. (2013). Granger causality is designed to measure effect, not mechanism. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fninf.2013.00006

Brick, N. E., MacIntyre, T. E., & Campbell, M. J. (2016). Thinking and Action: A Cognitive Perspective on Self-Regulation during Endurance Performance. Frontiers in Physiology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00159

Brisswalter, J., Durand, M., Delignieres, D., & Legros, P. (1995). Optimal and non-optimal demand in a dual-task of pedaling and simple reaction time: Effects on energy expenditure and cognitive performance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 29, 15–34.

Chang, Y.-K., Chi, L., Etnier, J. L., Wang, C.-C., Chu, C.-H., & Zhou, C. (2014). Effect of acute aerobic exercise on cognitive performance: Role of cardiovascular fitness. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(5), 464–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.04.007

Ciria, L. F., Luque-Casado, A., Sanabria, D., Holgado, D., Ivanov, P. Ch., & Perakakis, P. (2019). Oscillatory brain activity during acute exercise: Tonic and transient neural response to an oddball task. Psychophysiology, 56(5), e13326. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13326

Ciria, L. F., Perakakis, P., Luque-Casado, A., & Sanabria, D. (2018). Physical exercise increases overall brain oscillatory activity but does not influence inhibitory control in young adults. NeuroImage, 181, 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.009

Duckworth, S. C., Higginbotham, C. S., Pederson, J. A., Rogers, R. R., Marshall, M. R., Williams, T. D., & Ballmann, C. G. (2021). Physical and Cognitive Performance During Upper-Extremity Versus Full-Body Exercise Under Dual Tasking Conditions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128(1), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512520945088

Edwards, A. M., & Polman, R. C. J. (2013). Pacing and awareness: Brain regulation of physical activity. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 43(11), 1057–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0091-4

Faes, L., Nollo, G., Stramaglia, S., & Marinazzo, D. (2017). Multiscale Granger causality. Physical Review E, 96(4), 042150. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.042150

Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791

Holgado, D., & Sanabria, D. (2021). Does self-paced exercise depend on executive processing? A narrative review of the current evidence. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14(1), 130–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2020.1774915

Kim, S.-J., Koh, K., Boyd, S., & Gorinevsky, D. (2009). L1 Trend Filtering. SIAM Review, 51(2), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1137/070690274

McCarthy, J. P., & Wyatt, F. B. (2003). Prediction equation: Power output from heart rate for cyclists. International Sports Journal, 7(1), 56–61.

Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220

Pinto, H., Pernice, R., Silva, M. E., Javorka, M., Faes, L., & Rocha, A. P. (2022). Multiscale partial information decomposition of dynamic processes with short and long-range correlations: Theory and application to cardiovascular control. Physiological Measurement, 43(8), 085004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ac826c

Robertson, I. H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B. T., & Yiend, J. (1997). `Oops!’: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35(6), 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00015-8

Schreiber, T., & Schmitz, A. (1996). Improved Surrogate Data for Nonlinearity Tests. Physical Review Letters, 77(4), 635–638. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.635

Shojaie, A., & Fox, E. B. (2022). Granger causality: A review and recent advances. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 9, 289-319.

Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(3), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020586

Zandonai, T., Holgado, D., Ciria, L. F., Zabala, M., Hopker, J., Bekinschtein, T., & Sanabria, D. (2021). Novel evidence on the effect of tramadol on self-paced high-intensity cycling. Journal of Sports Sciences, 39(13), 1452–1460. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2021.1877440

Downloads

Posted

2023-10-24