Optimizing Research Methodology for the Detection of Individual Response Variation in Resistance Training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51224/SRXIV.340Keywords:
Resistance Training, Individual response, Methods, n-of-1Abstract
Most resistance training research focuses on group-level outcomes (i.e., group A versus group B). However, many practitioners are more interested in training responses on the individual level (i.e., intervention A versus intervention B for individual X). In order to properly examine individual response variation, multiple confounding sources of variation (e.g., random sampling variation, measurement error, biological variation) must be addressed. Novel study designs where participants complete both interventions and at least one intervention twice can be leveraged to account for these sources of variation. Specifically, the appropriate statistical methods can separate variability into the signal (i.e., participant-by-training interaction) versus the noise (i.e., within-participant variance). This distinction can allow researchers to detect evidence of individual response variation. If evidence of individual response variation exists, researchers can explore potential predictors of the more favorable intervention, thereby improving exercise prescription. This review outlines the methodology necessary to explore individual response variation to resistance training, predict favorable interventions, and the limitations thereof.
Metrics
References
Currier BS, Mcleod JC, Banfield L, Beyene J, Welton NJ, D’Souza AC, et al. Resistance training prescription for muscle strength and hypertrophy in healthy adults: A systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine [Internet]. 2023;bjsports-2023-106807. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2023-106807
Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences [Internet]. 2016;35:1073–82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1210197
Ralston GW, Kilgore L, Wyatt FB, Baker JS. The effect of weekly set volume on strength gain: A meta-analysis. Sports Medicine [Internet]. 2017;47:2585–601. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0762-7
LOPEZ P, RADAELLI R, TAAFFE DR, NEWTON RU, GALVÃO DA, TRAJANO GS, et al. Resistance training load effects on muscle hypertrophy and strength gain: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise [Internet]. 2020;53:1206–16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000002585
Refalo MC, Hamilton DL, Paval DR, Gallagher IJ, Feros SA, Fyfe JJ. Influence of resistance training load on measures of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and improvements in maximal strength and neuromuscular task performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences [Internet]. 2021;39:1723–45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2021.1898094
Hubal MJ, Gordish-Dressman H, Thompson PD, Price TB, Hoffman EP, Angelopoulos TJ, et al. Variability in muscle size and strength gain after unilateral resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:964–72.
Erskine RM, Jones DA, Williams AG, Stewart CE, Degens H. Inter-individual variability in the adaptation of human muscle specific tension to progressive resistance training. European Journal of Applied Physiology [Internet]. 2010;110:1117–25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1601-9
Klemp A, Dolan C, Quiles JM, Blanco R, Zoeller RF, Graves BS, et al. Volume-equated high- and low-repetition daily undulating programming strategies produce similar hypertrophy and strength adaptations. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism [Internet]. 2016;41:699–705. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2015-0707
Dolan C. THE INFLUENCE OF TIME-EQUATED TRAINING PROGRAMS ON MUSCLE HYPERTROPHY, STRENGTH, AND BODY COMPOSITION.
Helms ER, Byrnes RK, Cooke DM, Haischer MH, Carzoli JP, Johnson TK, et al. RPE vs. Percentage 1RM loading in periodized programs matched for sets and repetitions. Frontiers in Physiology [Internet]. 2018;9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00247
Robinson ZP. The effect of resistance training proximity to failure on muscular adaptations and longitudinal fatigue in trained men. Master’s Thesis. 2021;
Hecksteden A, Kraushaar J, Scharhag-Rosenberger F, Theisen D, Senn S, Meyer T. Individual response to exercise training - a statistical perspective. Journal of Applied Physiology [Internet]. 2015;118:1450–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00714.2014
Steele J, Fisher J, Smith D, Schoenfeld B, Yang Y, Nakagawa S. Meta-analysis of variation in sport and exercise science. 2022; Available from: https://doi.org/10.51224/srxiv.214
Aube D, Wadhi T, Rauch J, Anand A, Barakat C, Pearson J, et al. Progressive resistance training volume: Effects on muscle thickness, mass, and strength adaptations in resistance-trained individuals. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research [Internet]. 2020;36:600–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003524
Sousa Fortes L de, Cunha Costa M da, Perrier-Melo RJ, Brito-Gomes JL, Nascimento-Júnior JRA, Lima-Júnior DRAA de, et al. Effect of volume in resistance training on inhibitory control in young adults: A randomized and crossover investigation. Frontiers in Psychology [Internet]. 2018;9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02028
Scarpelli MC, Nóbrega SR, Santanielo N, Alvarez IF, Otoboni GB, Ugrinowitsch C, et al. Muscle hypertrophy response is affected by previous resistance training volume in trained individuals. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research [Internet]. 2020;36:1153–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003558
Simoneau J-A, Lortie G, Boulay MR, Thibault M-C, Bouchard C. Repeatability of fibre type and enzyme activity measurements in human skeletal muscle. Clinical Physiology [Internet]. 1986;6:347–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-097x.1986.tb00240.x
Staron RS, Leonardi MJ, Karapondo DL, Malicky ES, Falkel JE, Hagerman FC, et al. Strength and skeletal muscle adaptations in heavy-resistance-trained women after detraining and retraining. Journal of Applied Physiology [Internet]. 1991;70:631–40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1991.70.2.631
Räntilä A, Ahtiainen JP, Avela J, Restuccia J, Dawson K, Häkkinen K. High responders to hypertrophic strength training also tend to lose more muscle mass and strength during detraining than low responders. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research [Internet]. 2021;Publish Ahead of Print. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000004044
Haischer MH, Cooke DM, Carzoli JP, Johnson TK, Shipherd AM, Zoeller RF, et al. Impact of cognitive measures and sleep on acute squat strength performance and perceptual responses among well-trained men and women. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research [Internet]. 2021;35:S16–22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003202
Hendy AM, Lamon S. The cross-education phenomenon: Brain and beyond. Frontiers in Physiology [Internet]. 2017;8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00297
Senn S, Rolfe K, Julious SA. Investigating variability in patient response to treatment a case study from a replicate cross-over study. Statistical Methods in Medical Research [Internet]. 2010;20:657–66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280210379174
Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research [Internet]. 2005;19:231. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1519/15184.1
Swinton PA, Hemingway BS, Saunders B, Gualano B, Dolan E. A statistical framework to interpret individual response to intervention: Paving the way for personalized nutrition and exercise prescription. Frontiers in Nutrition [Internet]. 2018;5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2018.00041
Batterham AM. Is the intervention as good as (or not substantially worse than) a comparator? Experimental Physiology [Internet]. 2022;107:199–200. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1113/ep090321
Hammarström D, Øfsteng S, Koll L, Hanestadhaugen M, Hollan I, Apró W, et al. Benefits of higher resistance-training volume are related to ribosome biogenesis. The Journal of Physiology [Internet]. 2020;598:543–65. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1113/jp278455
Shmueli G. To explain or to predict? Statistical Science [Internet]. 2010;25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1214/10-sts330
Caldwell AR, Andrew D. Vigotsky and, Tenan MS, Radel R, Mellor DT, Kreutzer A, et al. Moving sport and exercise science forward: A call for the adoption of more transparent research practices. Sports Medicine [Internet]. 2020;50:449–59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01227-1
Mesquida C, Murphy J, Lakens D, Warne J. Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: A narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field. Royal Society Open Science [Internet]. 2022;9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220946
Hopkins WG. Individual responses made easy. Journal of Applied Physiology [Internet]. 2015;118:1444–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00098.2015
Williamson PJ, Atkinson G, Batterham AM. Inter-individual responses of maximal oxygen uptake to exercise training: A critical review. Sports Medicine [Internet]. 2017;47:1501–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0680-8
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Zac Robinson, Eric R. Helms, Eric T. Trexler, James Steele, Michael E. Hall, Chun-Jung Huang, Michael C. Zourdos (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
