Preprint / Version 1

Wearable technology in sport

Protocol for a scoping review

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51224/SRXIV.280

Keywords:

Scoping review, wearable, technology, sport, physiology

Abstract

Introduction: Wearable technology has grown rapidly over the last decade and exists within sport in many forms such as smart jewellery (e.g., watches, wristbands, and rings), body-mounted sensors and smart clothing. Technologies placed on the skin can measure physiological variables such as heart rate, breathing rate, and blood glucose. With the exponential expansion of wearable technology, there remains a large degree of uncertainty regarding the breadth and depth of available technologies with applications to sporting activities. The objective of the scoping review is to investigate which wearable technologies placed on the skin have been developed or are in development for use in sporting activities to measure physiological variables.

 

Methods: The review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews known as the PRISMA-ScR. Four databases (i.e., Pub-Med, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science), two grey literature databases (i.e., Open Grey and EthOS) and conference proceedings (i.e., IEEE International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks) will be searched. Two independent reviewers will initially screen the title and abstracts, before then assessing the full text of the remaining articles. The relevant data will be extracted and presented in tabular form with a narrative summary.

 

Dissemination: The scoping review will summarise the available literature that utilises wearable technology applicable for sport, with the findings used to direct future sensors and research. The authors aim to publish the review in a peer-reviewed journal and present the findings at a relevant conference.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

J. P. Burnham., et al. “Using Wearable Technology to Predict Health Outcomes: A Literature Review.” In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 25, 9, (2018), pp. 1221–27, https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy082.

M. Cardinale and M. C. Varley. “Wearable Training-Monitoring Technology: Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities.” In: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12, S2, (2017), pp. 55-62, URL: https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2016-0423.

D. Duarte, and J. P. S. Cunha. “Wearable Health Devices—Vital Sign Monitoring, Systems and Technologies.” In: Sensors, 18, 8, (2018), p. 2414, https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082414

C. Foster, et al. “Monitoring Training Loads: The Past, the Present, and the Future.” In: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12, S2, (2017), pp. S2-2-S2-8, https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2016-0388.

A. Godfrey, V. Hetherington, H. Shum, P. Bonato, N. H. Lovell, S. Stuart. “From a to Z: Wearable Technology Explained.” In: Maturitas 113, (2018), pp. 40–47, URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.04.012.

S. L. Halson, “Monitoring Training Load to Understand Fatigue in Athletes.” In: Sports Medicine, 44, S2, (2014), pp. 139–47, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0253-z

International Data Corporation (IDC). "Wearables Unit Shipments Worldwide from 2014 to 2022 (in Millions)." Statista, Statista Inc. (2023), https://www.statista.com/statistics/437871/wearables-worldwide-shipments/

H. Khalil, M.D. Peters, P.A. McInerney, C.M. Godfrey, L. Alexander, C. Evans, D. Pieper, E.B. Moraes, A.C. Tricco, Z. Munn, and D. Pollock. “The role of scoping reviews in reducing research waste. In: Journal of clinical epidemiology”, 152, (2022). pp.30-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.09.012

M.D.J. Peters, C. Godfrey, P. McInerney, Z. Munn, A.C. Tricco and H. Khalil. “Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews (2020 version)”. In: E. Aromataris, Z. Munn (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, JBI, (2020). URL: https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12

A.C. Tricco, et al. “PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.” In: Annals of Internal Medicine, 169, 7, (2018), pp. 467–73. URL: https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850

UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC). “Eligibility of Technology Readiness Levels (TRL).” www.ukri.org, UKRI, (2022), URL: www.ukri.org/councils/stfc/guidance-for-applicants/check-if-youre-eligible-for-funding/eligibility-of-technology-readiness-levels-trl/

Downloads

Posted

2023-04-13