Preprint / Version 1

Correcting recent misunderstandings of the StARRT framework for return-to-play decision making

##article.authors##

  • Ian Shrier Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, McGill University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51224/SRXIV.177

Keywords:

return-to-play, decision making, rehabilitation, injury

Abstract

The Strategic Assessment of Risk and Risk Tolerance (StARRT) framework for return to play decision making follows a biopsychosocial causal philosophy for injury. A recent editorial in the British Journal of Sports Medicine suggested that the framework required modifications to incorporate “load”. However, the original framework already included load and the suggested modifications were based on a misunderstanding of the framework. Further, the power of the StARRT framework is in its simplicity which can be followed by any stakeholder (e.g. clinician, coach, participant).  The purpose of this article is to review and clarify how the StARRT framework is supposed to be applied, discuss that it already includes load, and demonstrate how it can be operationalized to specific contexts and implemented when designing load management strategies (training prescription) during rehabilitation.

References

M. Taberner, D.D. Cohen, A. Carter et al. 'Where is the load?' Revisiting the Strategic Assessment of Risk and Risk Tolerance (StARRT) framework for return to sport by including an athlete's sport-specific training capacity? Br J Sports Med 2022. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-105573

I. Shrier. The strategic assessment of risk and risk tolerance (StARRT) framework for return to play decision making. Br J Sports Med 2015;49:1311-1315. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094569

I. Shrier. Methods Matter: Some important challenges with instrumental variable methods. SportRxiv 2021:1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31236/osf.io/ve4na

D.W. Creighton, I. Shrier, R. Shultz et al. Return-to-play in sport: a decision-based model. Clin J Sport Med 2010;20(5):379-385. DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181f3c0fe

F.M. Impellizzeri, S.M. Marcora, A.J. Coutts. Internal and External Training Load: 15 Years On. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2019;14(2):270-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2018-0935

M. Helme, J. Tee, S. Emmonds et al. Does lower-limb asymmetry increase injury risk in sport? A systematic review. Phys Ther Sport 2021;49:204-213. DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.03.001

R. Shultz, J. Bido, I. Shrier et al. Team clinician variability in return-to-play decisions. Clin J Sport Med 2013;23(6):456-461. DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318295bb17

I. Shrier, P. Safai, L. Charland. Return-to-play following injury: Whose decision should it be? Br J Sports Med 2014;48:394-401. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092492

I. Shrier, A. Serner, A. Wangensteen et al. Measuring heterogeneity of reinjury risk assessments at the time of clearance to return to play: A feasibility study. J Sci Med Sport 2017;20:255-260. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.08.007

I. Shrier. Return to sport decision-based models. In: Noyes FR, Barber-Westin S, editors. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction and other knee operations. Switzerland: Springer, 2019:53-65.

Downloads

Posted

2022-07-17