DOI of the published article https://doi.org/10.51224/cik.2022.45
A Critical Review of Phyiotherapy Editor’s Comments on Statistical Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51224/SRXIV.138Keywords:
Statistics, Physiotherapy, Estimation, Significance, Confidence IntervalAbstract
Recently, a group of editors from physiotherapy journals wrote a joint editorial on the use of statistics. The editors, who were not statistical experts themselves, put forth numerous recommendations to physiotherapy researchers on how to analyze and report their statistical analyses. This editorial unfortunately suffers from numerous mischaracterizations or outright falsehoods regarding statistics. After a thorough review, two major issues appear throughout the editorial. First, the editors incorrectly state that the use of confidence intervals (CI) would alleviate some of the issues with significance testing. Second, the editors incorrectly assume “smallest worthwhile change” statistics are immutable facts related to some ground truth of treatment effects. In this critical review, we briefly outline some of the problematic statements made by the editors and offer some simple alternatives that we believe are statistical sound and easy for the average physiotherapy researcher to implement.
Metrics
References
Altman, D. G. (2003). Statistics notes: Interaction revisited: The difference between two estimates. BMJ, 326(7382), 219–219. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7382.219
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (2011). How to obtain the confidence interval from a p value. BMJ, 343(aug08 1), d2090–d2090. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d2090
Caldwell, A. R., & Cheuvront, S. N. (2019). Basic statistical considerations for physiology: The journal temperature toolbox. Temperature, 6(3), 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2019.1624131
Campbell, H., & Gustafson, P. (2018). Conditional equivalence testing: An alternative remedy for publication bias. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0195145. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195145
Deyle, G. D., Allen, C. S., Allison, S. C., Gill, N. W., Hando, B. R., Petersen, E. J., Dusenberry, D. I., & Rhon, D. I. (2020). Physical therapy versus glucocorticoid injection for osteoarthritis of the knee. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(15), 1420–1429. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1905877
Elkins, M. R., Pinto, R. Z., Verhagen, A., Grygorowicz, M., Söderlund, A., Guemann, M., Gómez-Conesa, A., Blanton, S., Brismée, J.-M., Ardern, C., Agarwal, S., Jette, A., Karstens, S., Harms, M., Verheyden, G., & Sheikh, U. (2022). Statistical inference through estimation: Recommendations from the international society of physiotherapy journal editors. Journal of Physiotherapy, 68(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2021.12.001
Ferreira, M. (2018). Research note: The smallest worthwhile effect of a health intervention. Journal of Physiotherapy, 64(4), 272–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2018.07.008
Higgins, J. P., Li, T., & Deeks, J. J. (2019). Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 143–176. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-06
Hoekstra, R., Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2014). Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1157–1164. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0572-3
Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963
Lindley, D. V. (1957). A statistical paradox. Biometrika, 44(1-2), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/44.1-2.187
Mayo, D. G. (2021). The statistics wars and intellectual conflicts of interest. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13861
Mazzolari, R., Porcelli, S., Bishop, D. J., & Lakens, D. (2022). Myths and methodologies: The use of equivalence and non-inferiority tests for interventional studies in exercise physiology and sport science. Experimental Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/ep090171
Morey, R. D., Hoekstra, R., Rouder, J. N., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2015). The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0947-8
Rafi, Z., & Greenland, S. (2020). Semantic and cognitive tools to aid statistical science: Replace confidence and significance by compatibility and surprise. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01105-9
Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237.
Sainani, K. L., Borg, D. N., Caldwell, A. R., Butson, M. L., Tenan, M. S., Vickers, A. J., Vigotsky, A. D., Warmenhoven, J., Nguyen, R., Lohse, K. R., Knight, E. J., & Bargary, N. (2020). Call to increase statistical collaboration in sports science, sport and exercise medicine and sports physiotherapy. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 55(2), 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102607
Senn, S. (2005). Dichotomania: An obsessive compulsive disorder that is badly affecting the quality of analysis of pharmaceutical trials. Proceedings of the International Statistical Institute, 55th Session, Sydney.
Tenan, M. S., Simon, J. E., Robins, R. J., Lee, I., Sheean, A. J., & Dickens, J. F. (2020). Anchored minimal clinically important difference metrics: Considerations for bias and regression to the mean. Journal of Athletic Training, 56(9), 1042–1049. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0368.20
Downloads
Posted
Versions
- 2022-03-24 (6)
- 2022-03-24 (5)
- 2022-03-24 (4)
- 2022-03-24 (3)
- 2022-03-24 (2)
- 2022-03-24 (1)
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Matthew Tenan, Aaron Caldwell
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
