The meaning of ‘clean’ in anti-doping decision making
Moving toward integrity and conceptual clarity in support for athlete education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51224/SRXIV.120Keywords:
competitive sport, WADA, International Standards, education, anti-doping, athletes, integrity of sport, values-based education, spirit of sport, decision making, informed decision, agencyAbstract
With the World Anti-Doping Agency’s International Standard for Education (ISE) coming into effect in 2021, the clean-sport movement is at a pivotal stage. Through this conceptual paper we juxtapose the sector-wide anti-doping education as set out in the ISE on the decision-making process at the individual level. We discuss three critical issues for the clean-sport movement. First, we make the case for doping being a ‘wicked’ problem and outline the possible implications of this for prevention and detection. Second, we consider why we need to address regulative, normative, and cognitive components of clean sport if we are to maximise its legitimacy. Third, we critically expose the fluidity with which clean sport is defined, and the implications of defining clean sport in substance- versus rule-based terms, which respectively lead to theorising clean sport as ‘drug-free’ vs. ‘cheating-free’ sport. Finally, we consider the role and key components of anti-doping education and how the relevance of certain components may be dependent on the way clean sport is defined. Conceptualising doping as a sport integrity issue, we move away from the archaic and delimiting view of clean sport as drug-free sport and conclude with recommendations on how to reconcile values-based education, awareness raising, information provision and anti-doping education within the broader scope of integrity, to support informed decision making and personal agency.
Metrics
References
Alford, J., & Head, B.W. (2017) Wicked and less wicked problems: a typology and a contingency framework, Policy and Society, 36:3, 397-413.
Backhouse, S. H., Whitaker, L., & Petróczi, A. (2013). Gateway to doping? Supplement use in the context of preferred competitive situations, doping attitude, beliefs, and norms. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 23(2), 244-252.
Bagdasarov Z, Johnson JF, MacDougall AE, Steele LM, Connelly S, Mumford MD: Mental models and ethical decision making: The mediating role of sensemaking. J Bus Ethics 2015; doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2620-6.
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development: Theory, Research, and Applications (Vol. 1, pp. 71–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Barkoukis V, Lazuras L, Ourda D, Agnello S; Andjelkovic M, Bochaver K, Folkers D, Bondarev D, Dikic N, Dreiskämper D, Petróczi A, Strauss B, Zelli A. (2022). The role of comprehensive education in anti-doping policy legitimacy and support among clean athletes (forthcoming in Psychology of Exercise & Sport)
Blank, C., Kopp, M., Niedermeier, M., Schnitzer, M., & Schobersberger, W. (2016). Predictors of doping intentions, susceptibility, and behaviour of elite athletes: a meta-analytic review. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1333.
Bloodworth, A. J., & McNamee, M. (2017). Sport, society, and anti-doping policy: An ethical overview. In Acute Topics in Anti-Doping (Vol. 62, pp. 177-185). Karger Publishers.
Boardley, I. D., Chandler, M., Backhouse, S. H., & Petróczi, A. (2021). Co-creating a social science research agenda for clean sport: An international Delphi study. International Journal of Drug Policy, 103161.
Boardley, I. D., Grix, J., & Dewar, A. (2014). Moral disengagement and associated processes in performance enhancing drug use: A national qualitative investigation. Journal of Sport Sciences, 32, 836–844.
Boardley, I. D., Grix, J., & Harkin, J. (2015). Doping in Team and Individual Sports: A Qualitative Investigation of Moral Disengagement and Associated Processes. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise, & Health, 7, 698–717.
Boardley, I. D., Smith, A. L., Mills, J. P., Grix, J., & Wynne, C. (2017). Empathic and self-regulatory processes governing doping behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1495.
Brock ME, Vert A, Klingyte V, Waples EP, Sevier ST, Mumford MD: Mental models: An alternative evaluation of a sense-making approach to ethical instruction. Sci Eng Ethics 2008; 14:449-472.
Donovan, R. J., Egger, G., Kapernick, V., & Mendoza, J. (2002). A conceptual framework for achieving performance enhancing drug compliance in sport. Sports Medicine, 32(4), 269-284.
Donovan, R., Jalleh, G., & Daniel Gucciardi, D. (2015). A research package, including a standard questionnaire, to assist national anti-doping organizations (NADOs) (and other anti-doping stakeholders) measure athletes’ beliefs and behaviors with respect to doping, and to assess the effectiveness of anti-doping programs. WADA. Social Science Research Grant.
Engelberg, T., Moston, S., & Skinner, J. (2015). The final frontier of anti-doping: A study of athletes who have committed doping violations. Sport Management Review, 18(2), 268-279.
Fincoeur, B., Henning, A., & Ohl, F. (2020). Fifty shades of grey? On the concept of grey zones in elite cycling. Performance Enhancement & Health, 100179. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211266920300232
Frenger, M., Emrich, E., & Pitsch, W. (2013). How to produce the belief in clean sports which sells. Performance Enhancement & Health, 2(4), 210-215.
Gleaves, J., & Christiansen, A. V. (2019). Athletes’ perspectives on WADA and the code: a review and analysis. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 11(2), 341-353. Harkrider L, MacDougall AE, Bagdasarov Z, Johnson JF, Thiel CE, Mumford MD, Connelly S, Devenport LD: Structuring case-based ethics training: How comparing cases and structured prompts influence training effectiveness. Ethics Behav 2013; doi:10.1080/10508422.2013.774865.
Hauw D: Toward a situated and dynamic understanding of doping behaviors. In Tolleneer J, Sterckx S, Bonte P (Eds) Athletic enhancement, human nature and ethics. Springer: Netherlands. 2013: 219-235.
Johnson, M. B. (2011). A systemic model of doping behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 124(2), 151-162.
Johnson JF, Bagdasarov Z, MacDougall AE, Steele L, Connelly S, Devenport LD, Mumford MD: Improving ethical knowledge and sensemaking from cases through elaborative interrogation and outcome valence. Accountability Res 2014; 21:265-299.
Kazlauskas, A. (2007). Being expert in the 21st century. In Recent Advances in Doping Analysis, Manfred Donike Workshop, 25th Cologne Workshop on Dope Analysis, 25th February-2nd March, Cologne.
Kligyte V, Marcy RT, Waples EP, Sevier ST, Godfrey ES, Mumford MD, Hougen DF: Application of a sensemaking approach to ethics training in the physical sciences and engineering. Sci Eng Ethics 2008; 14(2):251-278.
Kirby, K., Moran, A., & Guerin, S. (2011). A qualitative analysis of the experiences of elite athletes who have admitted to doping for performance enhancement. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 3(2), 205-224.
Knapik, J. J., Steelman, R. A., Hoedebecke, S. S., Austin, K. G., Farina, E. K., & Lieberman, H. R. (2016). Prevalence of dietary supplement use by athletes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 46(1), 103-123.
Kreft, L. (2011). Elite sportspersons and commodity control: anti-doping as quality assurance. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 3(2), 151-161.
Lazuras, L., Barkoukis, V., & Tsorbatzoudis, H. (2015). Toward an integrative model of doping use: an empirical study with adolescent athletes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 37(1), 37-50.
Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123-152.
Loland, S., & McNamee, M. J. (2019). The ‘spirit of sport’, WADAs code review, and the search for an overlapping consensus. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 11(2), 325-339.
Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational Environments. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
Mortimer, H., Whitehead, J., Kavussanu, M., Gürpınar, B., & Ring, C. (2021). Values and clean sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 39(5), 533-541.
Ntoumanis, N., Ng, J. Y., Barkoukis, V., & Backhouse, S. (2014). Personal and psychosocial predictors of doping use in physical activity settings: a meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 44(11), 1603-1624.
Mumford MD, Connelly S, Brown RP, Murphy ST, Hill JH, Antes AL, Waples EP, Devenport LD: A sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics Behav 2008; 14:315-339.
Murray, T. H. (2016). The ethics of doping from a public health perspective. In Doping and Public Health (pp. 136-150). Routledge.
Overbye, M., Knudsen, M. L., & Pfister, G. (2013). To dope or not to dope: Elite athletes’ perceptions of doping deterrents and incentives. Performance Enhancement & Health, 2(3), 119-134.
Peters, B. G. (2017). What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program. Policy and Society, 36(3), 385-396.
Petróczi, A. (2021). Why clean sport is more than just drug-free. Nature, 592(7852), S16.
Petróczi, A. (2013). The doping mindset—part I: implications of the functional use theory on mental representations of doping. Performance Enhancement & Health, 2(4), 153-163.
Petróczi, A., Heyes, A., Thrower, S. N., Martinelli, L. A., Backhouse, S. H., Boardley, I. D., & RESPECT Consortium. (2021). Understanding and building clean (er) sport together: community-based participatory research with elite athletes and anti-doping organisations from five European countries. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 55, 101932.
Petróczi, A., Mazanov, J., & Naughton, D. P. (2011). Inside athletes' minds: preliminary results from a pilot study on mental representation of doping and potential implications for anti-doping. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 6(1), 10.
Petróczi, A., Norman, P., & Brueckner, S. (2017). Can we better integrate the role of anti-doping in sports and society? A psychological approach to contemporary value-based prevention. In Acute Topics in Anti-Doping (Vol. 62, pp. 160-176). Karger Publishers.
Pielke, R. A. (2016). The edge: The war against cheating and corruption in the cutthroat world of elite sports. Berkeley, CA: Roaring Forties Press.
Pitsiladis Y, Abatzis-Papadopoulos M, Ali N, Aggeloudis S, Atkinson C, Constandache B, Ganus Y, Geladas N, Giakoumakis S, Guner R, Howman D, Lima G, Khristenko E, Koskolou M, Klissouras V, Ladikas M, Loland S, McNamee M, Muniz B, Natsis K, Nicholson P, Ospina Betancurt J, Pappas E, Peteraitis M, Petróczi A, Papadopoulou T, Pigozzi F, Saugy M, Simon P, Singleton P, Sizikov E, Sottas P-E, Tanaka M, Wang G, Yang H. The Olympia Declaration. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 18(12), 448-451.
Richetin, J., Conner, M., & Perugini, M. (2011). Not doing is not the opposite of doing: Implications for attitudinal models of behavioral prediction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(1), 40-54.
Richetin, J., Perugini, M., Conner, M., Adjali, I., Hurling, R., Sengupta, A., & Greetham, D. (2012). To reduce and not to reduce resource consumption? That is two questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(2), 112-122.
Richetin, J., Osterini, D., & Conner, M. (2020). Predicting engaging in cosmetic surgery: A test of the role of doing and not doing cognitions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 50(1), 53-62.
Scott, W. R. (1981). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE.
Schultz, J. (2019). Good enough? The ‘wicked’ use of testosterone for defining femaleness in women’s sport. Sport in Society, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2019.1703684
Shelley, J., Thrower, S. N., & Petróczi, A. (2021). Racing clean in a tainted world: A qualitative exploration of the experiences and views of clean British elite distance runners on doping and anti-doping. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
Smith, A. C., & Stavros, C. (2020). Exploring the progressive use of performance enhancing substances by high-performance athletes. Substance Use & Misuse, 55(6), 914-927.
Sonenshein S: The role of construction, intuition and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy Management Rev 2007; 32:1022-1040.
Turnbull, N., & Hoppe, R. (2019). Problematizing ‘wickedness’: a critique of the wicked problems concept, from philosophy to practice. Policy and Society, 38(2), 315-337.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400.
van Bottenburg, M., Geeraert, A., & de Hon, O. The World Anti-Doping Agency: Guardian of Elite Sport’s Credibility. In Guardians of Public Value (pp. 185-210). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-51701-4_8
Viret, M. (2020). Using interdisciplinary tools to improve anti-doping: Utopia or necessity? The International Sports Law Journal, 20(1), 82-113.
WADA (2020). Code implementation Support programme. Guidelines for the International Standard for Education version 1. September 2020 https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/guidelinesforeducation_final.pdf)
WADA Anti-Doping Code (2021a) https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/2021_wada_code.pdf
WADA Prohibited List (2021b). https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/2021list_en.pdf
WADA International Standard for Education (2021c). https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/international_standard_ise_2020.pdf
Westaby, J. D. (2005). Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(2), 97-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.003
Whitaker, L., Long, J., Petróczi, A., & Backhouse, S. H. (2014). Using the prototype willingness model to predict doping in sport. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 24(5), e398-e405.
Woolf, J., & Mazanov, J. (2017). How athletes conceptualise doping, winning, and consequences: insights from using the cognitive interviewing technique with the Goldman dilemma. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 9(3), 303-320.
Woolway, T., Lazuras, L., Barkoukis, V., & Petróczi, A. (2020) “Doing What Is Right and Doing It Right”: A mapping review of athletes' perceived anti-doping legitimacy. International Journal of Drug Policy, 84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102865
Weick KE: Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 1995.
Williams, T. L., Patterson, L., Staff, H., Petroczi, A., Boardley, I., & Backhouse, S. H. (2020, December 8). Barriers and Enablers to Clean Sport: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis Informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B Model. https://doi.org/10.31236/osf.io/t9x5m
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrea Petroczi, Ian Boardley
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
